DARK SKIES BLOG

This speech is as good as it gets, particularly considering Obama’s machinations over the last week…

Click here to watch video

The author of this article understands that Obama is using code when he speaks to his Muslim brothers about Israel’s 1967 borders and swapping land (excerpt Arutz Sheva)…

Israel’s friends and foes seem to be dancing at the same wedding. Those people at AIPAC applauded when President Obama urged a two-state “solution” and even when he proposed a land “swap.” I’m not sure if he used the word “transfer” but it’s on the lips of everybody else. Is anybody listening to these words?

That language goes back to the Wannsee Conference, Jan. 1942. This is where the Holocaust officially began when Hitler’s lieutenants met to formulate a “final solution to the Jewish question.” We’re still talking about this? I sometimes wonder if people forget that we left Auschwitz and arrived in Israel. The best and the brightest Germans knew linguistics. They used code.

The Wannsee Conference was not about ovens. It was about TRAIN SCHEDULES.

It was about “transferring” Jews from one place to another.

Read the rest…

Misunderstanding? No way.

Obama is using the classic Arafat strategy! Make a bold statement to your Muslim brothers to let them know you stand with them (in this case regarding their goal of destroying Israel) and then, if the civilized world accidentally catches it and protests, claim you have been ‘misunderstood.’

In this one instance, Obama is neither naive nor a bumbler. He is to be commended on his facile use of taqiyya.

But he is naive indeed if he believes Netanyahu didn’t notice.

This is a short, to the point video that focuses on one single feature that would be impossible were it not for tampering. Is this the smoking gun? You decide.

Here is the essence of the video…and it is amazing.

If the Obama birth certificate is, as purported, a scan of a 1961 typewritten document (typed using a 1961 or earlier typewriter), each and every letter typed on that document should be unique…no two typewritten letters are ever identical. This is because each time a letter is typed, a key is struck with a different amount of force and the typebar attached to that key strikes a different point on the typewriter ribbon for each letter typed (since a typewriter ribbon is cloth infused with ink, no two places would be identical or contain an identical amount of ink). Ergo, the chances that two separate “B’s” on a typewritten document would be the same would be extraordinarily remote if not downright impossible.

Test it for yourself by examining other letters on the birth certificate pdf. What I have done below, anyone can do. I simply enlarged the pdf document to a point at which any differences would be visible and then cut and pasted the subject letters side by side into MS Paint.

In other words, two identical “B’s” like the ones below would require a computer-driven word processor.

This means that the birth certificate provided by Obama wasn’t a scanned image of a 1961 pre-computer typewritten document but a computer created and manipulated one.

See for yourself. Can you find any differences?

Figure 1 is the letter “B” from the word Obama (Child’s Last Name) in box 1c and Figure 2 is the letter “B” from the word Obama in the “Full Name of Father” section in box 8.

If interested, click the image to read reviews…

After referring to Trump as “the Al Sharpton of the Republican Party,” Krauthammer tells Fox that he was shocked to receive a phone call from The Donald…

It was a surprise, and when my secretary told me, I put on a helmet and a flak jacket as I answered the phone. I expected a tirade, which he had every right to do given what I have been saying about him. In fact, he was courteous–very calm–and he made his case, rather than sort of attacking everything I said about him…

Here’s the video, see for yourself (by the way, Charles adds that Trump’s ‘absolutely’ running)…

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

Just received this embed!

“Poor Al Gore! Done in by the very internet he created…”

Bibi hopes to form a broad coalition, but Livni says “no way.” From today’s JPost (excerpt)…

After the failure of his last-ditch effort to muster Kadima leader Tzipi Livni’s support for a unity government on Friday, President Shimon Peres formally entrusted Likud chairman Binyamin Netanyahu with the task of building a coalition.

Netanyahu arrived as Beit Hanassi on Friday afternoon and received the president’s official letter of appointment.

Earlier, after emerging from a meeting with Peres, Livni announced that she had no intention of joining a broad coalition under Netanyahu, despite the Likud chairman’s assertion that he was willing to “go to great lengths” in order to induce Kadima to join his government.

Note: To watch the movie Fitna, click here.

I don’t agree with everything he says, but Pat Condell presents a very clear picture of the problem of dhimmitude in Europe.

Video on next page…click here!

The Sun UK reported this week that 40 terrorists (al-Qaeda) were killed by the Black Death in Algeria and it might have been spread to other cells outside Algeria.

The al-Qaeda epidemic began in the cave hideouts of AQLIM in Tizi Ouzou province, 150km east of the capital Algiers. The group, led by wanted terror boss Abdelmalek Droudkal, was forced to turn its shelters in the Yakouren forest into mass graves and flee.

Robert Maginnis (in Human Events today) raises the most important point about this incident and that is (excerpt)…

…whether the North African fanatics fell victim to the naturally-occurring pathogen or (whether) the group mistakenly released the killer bug while brewing it for terror attacks.

Read the entire Maginnis article (very interesting).

Let’s hope bioterrorism isn’t Obama’s first test. It could be devastating!

A Dutch court yesterday overruled a prior court decision and argued that Geert Wilders should be prosecuted for “inciting hatred and discrimination” and also “for insulting Muslim worshipers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism” in his film Fitna (click here to see the video posting of Fitna).

Excerpt from the WSJ Online today (emphasis added)…

There are of course limits to free speech, such as calls for violence. But one doesn’t need to agree with Mr. Wilders to acknowledge that he hasn’t crossed that line. Some Muslims say they are outraged by his statements. But if freedom of speech means anything, it means the freedom of controversial speech. Consensus views need no protection.

This is exactly what Dutch prosecutors said (previously) in June when they rejected the complaints against Mr. Wilders. “That comments are hurtful and offensive for a large number of Muslims does not mean that they are punishable,” the prosecutors said in a statement. “Freedom of expression fulfills an essential role in public debate in a democratic society. That means that offensive comments can be made in a political debate.”

We will follow this new development closely. Good luck, Geert!