To my way of thinking, this film captures what America is losing under Obama…and what can be gained by returning to what made America great!

Here is the final scene of that film.

Nine minutes of one of the finest scenes in American film history and in American story telling…

As I see it, the Left is tolerant only of those who threaten them. They are cowardly and want desperately to appease (read tolerate) Islam because they believe Islam’s violent nature can be avoided by acquiescence and submission.

They hate war because they believe its existence, like that of God, depends on whether or not they believe in it. They believe war can be avoided by simply ignoring it and refusing to fight.

The Left is the girlish or effeminate boy, immature, frightened adolescent aspect of American life compared to the Right, which is the adult/parental, strong man/woman, responsible, civilized, honorable, self-respecting aspect.

Just as parents cannot let children rule the house, the Right must take charge of the American political environment if it wants to end the chaos injected into it by Obama and his followers.

Glenn Beck and those who attended the Restoring Honor Rally took a big step in that direction yesterday.

Lewis, in his article Obama Is Colluding with a New Fascist Imperialism, does a brilliant job of stripping away the contrived facade of the Left to reveal how its cowardice enables the Fascist bullies of the world.

And he paints a clear and bleak picture of how the soldiers of Islam are taking full advantage of the Left to advance their plan to drive the world into dhimmitude.

Here’s an excerpt…

Wherever Islamic fascists go, they first like to frighten and intimidate less warlike peoples — as in London today, where any BBC criticism of Islamic fascists is streng verboten. That’s what the Ground Zero Mosque and the Mohammed cartoon uproar have in common: They are purposeful agitprop campaigns to scare and intimidate all the weak-willed liberals in the West, a standard Islamist tactic to conquer by intimidation, just as Muslim conquerors have always done. Why bother to wage war when you can win by terror? Putin understands that, the Chinese understand it, and it’s clear enough around the Middle East. Only American liberals and European socialists are in denial. That’s why they are the biggest round-heels in the world. They will happily collude in their own subjection and degradation.

Islamic practice has always required mosques to have the highest towers in any subjugated city. No Jews or Christians were ever allowed to build higher places of worship, to ride higher (on horses or mules), or even to raise their heads higher while walking the streets than any Muslim. If you were a Jew or a Christian, you would duck your head deep down as you passed a Muslim, who was allowed to spit on you at will. As recently as the Ottoman Empire (crumbled in 1917), all dhimmis were unceremoniously beaten to the ground if they dared to raise their heads higher than a passing Muslim. Modern Westerners deny the obvious, but that is because they are wishful idiots, self-inflicted ignorami, and dead meat to all the predators of this world. It’s Little Red Riding Hood skipping into the dark forest again, but this time nobody told her about the Big Bad Wolf.

He states unequivocally that Obama and Holder are unprecedented in not only refusing to defend citizens of the U.S. but aligning themselves with a foreign government and its drug cartels in attacking the very people they have sworn to protect.

Here is the video of Prof Lovell and below it is the rebuttal by Judge Napolitano…

H/T to Liberty Juice and Dittos Rush!

Does he think folks over by the Coke machine (approximately 8-10 feet away) might be unable to hear his speech?

Along these same lines, we wrote a short article back in December 2009 (‘Obama’s New Amerikan Plantation’) in which we said…

[Socialism is] the destruction of freedom so that those who fear it are no longer threatened or tempted by it (freedom, that is). Socialism creates a zoo for us to live in. It rids humanity of all the excellence and invention and creativity that free men are capable of…and replaces it with a vast, inescapable plantation of shared mediocrity and hopelessness.

Here’s the trailer to Pastor Bryant’s upcoming film (to be released in 2011)…

Upon her resignation the NAACP released a statement concurring “with US Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in accepting the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for her remarks at a local NAACP Freedom Fund banquet.”

Later, after a review of the situation, the NAACP released another statement reversing the first (here is an excerpt)…

With regard to the initial media coverage of the resignation of USDA Official Shirley Sherrod, we have come to the conclusion we were snookered by Fox News and Tea Party Activist Andrew Breitbart into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias.

Having reviewed the full tape, spoken to Ms. Sherrod, and most importantly heard the testimony of the white farmers mentioned in this story, we now believe the organization that edited the documents did so with the intention of deceiving millions of Americans.   Source

As reported by Brett Baier on last night’s Special Report (Fox), Fox had only reported the story after the resignation of Sherrod and played no role in “snookering” the NAACP.

Breitbart, on the other hand, appeared to swing in the wind until last night when he told John King of CNN that the video was not about Shirley Sherrod but about the NAACP’s enthusiasm for what appeared to be her racist statements. Breitbart went on so tell King “that the real context of the Shirley Sherrod videos at the NAACP Freedom Fund Dinner begins with last week’s resolution by the NAACP labeling the Tea Party movement as racist.”

Here’s the video…

Breitbart also explains his motives to Hannity and provides the details of how he came into possession of the Shirley Sherrod/NAACP tape in the following video (the original Sherrod tape is played first and the new part begins at the 3:40 mark)…

Per Breitbart.com (again note that Breitbart’s appearance in the video begins at the 3:40 mark…so move the cursor forward to avoid a repeat of old footage)…

Breitbart reiterates the first video released on Breitbart.tv features Sherrod telling a racist tale that is received by the NAACP audience with laughter and cheers. The audience wasn’t cheering redemption; they were cheering discrimination.

Breitbart clarifies he released the video to target not Sherrod, but the NAACP who had condemned the Tea Party’s alleged racism. Though Sherrod became the scapegoat, it was the delight the NAACP audience took in the racist part of Sherrod’s speech that was truly damning. Breitbart noted he’s agnostic to her firing.

Later on the Breitbart.tv Publisher argued bogus racism charges flung at the Tea Party are meant to distract the public from staggering unemployment figures and other hot-button political topics unfavorable to the Democrats and the left. Source

In this case, he tells the truth about Islam in Africa.

In today’s NYPost (The Coming Crusade–Ralph Peters), he shines the light on Islam’s losing battle to dominate the lives of the poor peoples of East Africa. And he speaks of how the gains of Christianity in Africa will eventually (probably sooner rather than later) bring it in into direct conflict with increasingly moribund, but deeply angry, Islam

Here’s are a few excerpts…

A few years back, during one of four major research trips to sub-Saharan Africa, I visited the traditionally Muslim city of Mombassa on the old Swahili (Arab-slaver’s) coast in Kenya. What I found was one of the sharpest religious juxtapositions I’ve seen in global travels.

Thanks to Saudi funding folly, there were far too many mosques for the congregants, so few hit critical mass. Islam in Mombassa felt sleepy, dusty and dull.

Kenya’s Muslims were backward and listless. Condemned to poverty by poor educations (the Saudis pay Muslims to send their children to madrassahs, instead of to state schools), their culture seemed out of steam.

But Christianity blazed. Mega-churches couldn’t contain all those who’d accepted Jesus as their Savior: City parks were packed with ecstatic worshippers every Sunday.

All along east Africa’s Swahili Coast — once a necklace of gems on the body of Islam — the faith of Mohammed seemed like a museum exhibit in a neglected side room. The Christians — from tribes Muslims had enslaved — were the rising power.

As far as converts go, Muslims are being baptized (at great personal risk), but Christians aren’t converting to Islam. Wahhabi Islam’s rejection of joy just doesn’t speak to Africans — who even in misfortune seem incomparably alive.

Yet, however much Christianity is ascendant, Islam isn’t just going to give up without a battle.  After all, despite its obfuscations to the contrary, Islam is a religion of war!  And as such, its adherents in African regularly butcher Christians for their faith.

But in the end, as Peters points out, African Christians can and will take only so much.

As the death cult of Islam inflicts itself on the religion of joy, it would do well to remember that the excitable religious fervor of Christians, when pushed beyond its breaking point, could quickly become transformed into an overwhelming and devastating army of crusaders.

For fans of Lieutenant Colonel Peters, his latest book is “Endless War.”