In Ralph Peters‘ current article in the New York Post, he doesn’t mince words about Obama’s painfully poor grasp of national security issues. He also makes another point that is completely new to our ears and shocking if true. Peters says:

Those who knew Obama in his university days claim that he couldn’t be persuaded to study history.

This would go a long way in explaining many of Obama’s gaffes and misstatements. If true, and we have no reason to believe Peters would make such a claim if not based on evidence, Obama would be as dangerously naive as he seems.

One can only hope that the MSM eventually comes to its senses and helps to expose this “Chauncey Gardiner” for the empty suit he is.

Read the Ralph Peters article here…

“OBAMA VS. OSAMA: PROMISES AREN’T PLANS, BARACK”